medical device patents, patent infringement

Intravenous Safety Catheters- Patent Dispute

In European market Poly Medicure wins patent battle against Braun Melsungen

The patent dispute between the two companies began at the Medica 2009 trade fair

B Braun melsungen (German pharmaceutical) entity is a well known brand in medical technology domain in Europe. However, recently B Braun melsungen has lost a patent dispute with the Indian competitor Polymedicure

The research and development vertical of Polymedicure is approved by Ministry of Science & Technology Government of India to design & develop new and innovative products from Design to production in a short span of time using rapid prototyping 3 D printer CAD/CAM technology etc. The Indian entity possess ultra modern tool room with sophisticated machines like CNC wire cut, EDM and Vertical Machining Center.

Case Study

B. Braun is pioneer in research and development of intravenous safety catheters with protection in numerous European countries.

When a physician applies such a catheter to a patient, a needle guard automatically protrudes over the tip when the needle is withdrawn from the arm. This protects the doctor and nursing staff.

It is a known fact that conventional catheters lack such a needle guard. Nurses and other healthcare personnel are routinely injured by the exposed, sharp lancet of the needle after use on a patient. The critical time where a percutaneous injury can occur is from the moment the needle is withdrawn from the patient, or I.V. port, to the time the contaminated needle is safety discarded.

Polymedicure had a similar technology for needle protection and sells intravenous safety catheters which is different from B. Braun patent.

European patent office (EPO) has rejected three B. Braun patents. The patent battle lasted for eight years between B. Braun and Polymedicure.

Now Polymedicure can freely use the European market. According to Himanshu Baid, MD- Polymedicure, the patent war was fought in following countries Germany, NetherlandsSpain and Italy.

band lawyer india, brand infringement, brand trademark, trademark filling in India, trademark infringement, Uncategorized

Indian Trademark Infringement Case Study: Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v/s Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd

Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v/s Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd

Indian Trademark Infringement Case Study


Is It Trademark Infringement?
What is a protected trademark?

“Best case scenario, the mark is a blend of two well known English words. Once a typical phrase in the English dialect which specifically describes the item is embraced by a business enterprise, such reception normally entails the risk that others in the field would also be qualified for use such phrases gave no endeavor is made to ride on the fleeting trend of the appellant’s indubitably market driving item ‘Sugar Free’. In this association, simply because the attributes of ‘sugar free’ can be described by different phrases can’t detract from the regular usage of the phrase ‘Sugar Free’ as signifying products which don’t contain sugar and any dealer which adopts such mark in the market, does so with the unmistakable learning of the possibility of different traders also using the said mark. That is precisely the reason for the dissent of assurance to such marks by refusing registration as envisaged by Sections 9, Section 30 and Section 35 of the Trademarks Act, 1999.”

Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Trademark infringement is the unauthorized use of a trademark or service mark on or in connection with goods and/or services in a manner that is likely to cause confusion, deception, or mistake about the source of the goods and/or services.
What constitutes an infringement of trademark?

It is one of the biggest privately held pharmaceutical organizations in India, headquartered at Ahmadabad, in the State of Gujarat. In the course of the most recent six decades, the organization has been creating and manufacturing pharmaceutical items in India and offering and dispersing these in more than eighty-five different nations around the globe. It focuses unequivocally on Innovation and Research, the organization is available in more than forty-five helpful zones spread crosswise over twelve specialties, including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, analgesics, haematinics, hostile to infective and anti-microbial, respiratory operators, ant diabetics, and immunological.

Recently Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. filed a suit against Gujarat co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd & oths.

It manages the Establishment of an immediate linkage between milk makers and customers by taking out mediators, Milk Producers (agriculturists) control acquirement, handling, and marketing and, Proficient administration.

GCMMF (Amul) has helped India to rise as the biggest milk maker on the planet. More than 15 million milk makers pour their milk in 1, 44,500 dairy helpful social orders the nation over. Their milk is prepared in 184 District Co-agent Unions and promoted by 22 State Marketing Federations, guaranteeing a superior life for millions.The case has been filed over use of the words “Sugar free”.

Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 2001 PTC 541 (SC) Full Bench Brief to market the drug under the trade mark of “FALCIGO” all over India

Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. and Ors’ 2009 (41) PTC 336 (Del.) (DB) is a judgment of the Delhi high Court that arrangements with the issue of mediating the peculiarity of a trademark when it is at first sight, “expressive” in character.For the situation, Cadila Healthcare Ltd. propelled an item containing ‘aspartame’, a sugar substitute, under the brand name ‘Sugar-Free’ in the year 1988.

Cadila had purportedly coined and embraced the trademark ‘Sugar-Free’ and was the principal client of the said trademark in India. Gujarat Co-operative received a stamp consisting of the words ‘Sugar-Free’ for their solidified pastry, indistinguishable with and misleadingly like the Cadila’s trademark.

The Gujarat Co-operative notwithstanding, as a matter of fact, were not offering their items under the name ‘Sugar-Free’, yet utilizing the same as an expressive modifier for their item. Cadila recorded a suit under the steady gaze of the educated Single Judge looking for a declaration of changeless injunction for controlling Gujarat Co-operative from utilizing as a part of any way, especially in connection with their items, the articulation ‘Sugar Free’, which Cadila asserted had obtained selectiveness as a trademark in connection with its different items.

The application for an injunction was expelled by the educated Single Judge, against which the present interest was recorded.It might be specified here that the litigant had a 74% offer in the sugar substitute market in India, plainly building up a prevalent premium.

The claim of eliteness depended upon the term ‘Sugar-Free’ being a coined word. The court decided that M/s Cadila Healthcare can’t be permitted to utilize the articulation since it was inalienable spellbinding in nature and has become a commonly utilized word in connection to nourishment and drinks. It likewise watched that “sugar-free” was not a coined word or an irregular combination of words.

Since it was a commonly utilized articulation in composed and additionally communicated in English, it could in this way not be hoarded for use by any exchange.

In perspective of the above supposition, the Court declined to concede an injunction on the utilization of the said check by Gujarat Co-operative as a piece of a sentence or appealing legend in order to portray the idea of their item.

They were that as it may, require diminishing the text dimension of the said term, which conspicuously stood greater than the trademark of the item.

tm 6 trademark
Is It Trademark Infringement?

Apply for TM Registration and discuss your brand strategy  and understand importance of brand, logo and tagline with expert consultants at Tech Corp International Strategist India TCIS, India.

Locations: Delhi, Gurgaon, Noida, Mumbai, Banglore


We at Tech Corp International Strategist India(TCIS) provide Trademark services:


We at TCIS,India evaluate your office action after client discussion and understanding his business quotes and let you know if there is a fair chance to get your trademark application approved. If you decide to hire our trademark lawyers / trademark attorneys at TCIS to draft a response to the office action, cost effective flat rates are available.

As experienced trademark attorneys we at TCIS are well versed in responding to office action letters issued by trademark examining attorneys at the Indian Patent Office(IPO) and Indian Trademark Office.

Trademark Monitoring Services

We at TCIS,India also offers trademark monitoring services for OUR  clients. This service is designed to protect the client’s trademark by periodically reviewing the records of the Indian Patent Office(IPO) and Indian Trademark Office, and additional sources, depending on the monitoring service requested, for applications to register, or use of, confusingly similar marks.

Other Services

The firm offers a variety of services, including representation in cancellation and opposition proceedings at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.


When you contact Trademark attorney at TCIS,India whether by phone or email, you can expect to receive prompt, professional, efficient and courteous service.

  • Clients of the firm enjoy the following:
  • Free initial trademark consultation with an experienced trademark attorney
  • Review of office actions by an experienced trademark attorney                
  • Trademark attorney personal attention to their matters                                        
  • Firm ideology of involvement that requires “going the extra mile”                      
  • Firm policy to return client phone calls and respond to emails immediately whenever practical                                                                                                  
  • Cost-effective flat rates



The strategist bases his strategy on the wisdom
Why do you need a techno legal strategist in a startup?

Co Author: Aarti Dhillon is a third-year law student pursuing BBA LLB (Hons.) with specialization in corporate laws from the College of Legal Studies, University of Petroleum and Energy studies. She is an enthusiastic individual with an emphasis on achieving astounding standards both personally and academically. She is an aspiring corporate law and patent law enthusiast who is captivated with exploring, learning and practicing technology, invention, business, and law simultaneously. In her opinion Law, business and technology have reliably been the thing that has intrigued her the most and how with genuine learning and practice with regards to the said three, one can organize the framework to oblige individuals’ individual needs. She plans to have an effective law career ahead and apply her aptitudes obtained from both her work and academic experience and further enable her to make a difference in people’s life.

Startup Attorney India, Startup India Strategist, Startup Lawyer India

#FallingUnicorns: Reason for failure of Startups

Brand strategist & trademark patent attorney in India

The SIMPLE reason for failure of #Startups across the globe is that they don’t build a STRONG Intellectual Property Portfolio.

Hire a #Brandstrategist #IPattorney WHO can identify the gaps in the business at the inception stage #FallingUnicorns

Defining Your Startup Idea by penning down your thoughts * Can I apply for  Patents?
  • Write down your business idea.
  • Talk to a patent attorney who can apply for a patent.
  • Understand what types of inventions can be patented.
  • Understand what cannot be patented.
  • Determine the type of patent, and/or industrial design you need to protect your invention.

How do I get a patent on my idea?

How can I sell my invention?

How do I invent my idea?

#Askpatentexpert all your business questions

 Ten things I learned about running a Business Startup in India *Healthcare Mobile Applications #godigital from Prity Khastgir IPR Strategic Indian Patent Attorney Amplify Branding