In European market Poly Medicure wins patent battle against Braun Melsungen
The patent dispute between the two companies began at the Medica 2009 trade fair
B Braun melsungen (German pharmaceutical) entity is a well known brand in medical technology domain in Europe. However, recently B Braun melsungen has lost a patent dispute with the Indian competitor Polymedicure.
The research and development vertical of Polymedicure is approved by Ministry of Science & Technology Government of India to design & develop new and innovative products from Design to production in a short span of time using rapid prototyping 3 D printer CAD/CAM technology etc. The Indian entity possess ultra modern tool room with sophisticated machines like CNC wire cut, EDM and Vertical Machining Center.
B. Braun is pioneer in research and development of intravenous safety catheters with protection in numerous European countries.
When a physician applies such a catheter to a patient, a needle guard automatically protrudes over the tip when the needle is withdrawn from the arm. This protects the doctor and nursing staff.
It is a known fact that conventional catheters lack such a needle guard. Nurses and other healthcare personnel are routinely injured by the exposed, sharp lancet of the needle after use on a patient. The critical time where a percutaneous injury can occur is from the moment the needle is withdrawn from the patient, or I.V. port, to the time the contaminated needle is safety discarded.
Polymedicure had a similar technology for needle protection and sells intravenous safety catheters which is different from B. Braun patent.
European patent office (EPO) has rejected three B. Braun patents. The patent battle lasted for eight years between B. Braun and Polymedicure.
“Best case scenario, the mark is a blend of two well known English words. Once a typical phrase in the English dialect which specifically describes the item is embraced by a business enterprise, such reception normally entails the risk that others in the field would also be qualified for use such phrases gave no endeavor is made to ride on the fleeting trend of the appellant’s indubitably market driving item ‘Sugar Free’. In this association, simply because the attributes of ‘sugar free’ can be described by different phrases can’t detract from the regular usage of the phrase ‘Sugar Free’ as signifying products which don’t contain sugar and any dealer which adopts such mark in the market, does so with the unmistakable learning of the possibility of different traders also using the said mark. That is precisely the reason for the dissent of assurance to such marks by refusing registration as envisaged by Sections 9, Section 30 and Section 35 of the Trademarks Act, 1999.”
Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
It is one of the biggest privately held pharmaceutical organizations in India, headquartered at Ahmadabad, in the State of Gujarat. In the course of the most recent six decades, the organization has been creating and manufacturing pharmaceutical items in India and offering and dispersing these in more than eighty-five different nations around the globe. It focuses unequivocally on Innovation and Research, the organization is available in more than forty-five helpful zones spread crosswise over twelve specialties, including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, analgesics, haematinics, hostile to infective and anti-microbial, respiratory operators, ant diabetics, and immunological.
Recently Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. filed a suit against Gujarat co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd & oths.
It manages the Establishment of an immediate linkage between milk makers and customers by taking out mediators, Milk Producers (agriculturists) control acquirement, handling, and marketing and, Proficient administration.
GCMMF (Amul) has helped India to rise as the biggest milk maker on the planet. More than 15 million milk makers pour their milk in 1, 44,500 dairy helpful social orders the nation over. Their milk is prepared in 184 District Co-agent Unions and promoted by 22 State Marketing Federations, guaranteeing a superior life for millions.The case has been filed over use of the words “Sugar free”.
Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. and Ors’ 2009 (41) PTC 336 (Del.) (DB) is a judgment of the Delhi high Court that arrangements with the issue of mediating the peculiarity of a trademark when it is at first sight, “expressive” in character.For the situation, Cadila Healthcare Ltd. propelled an item containing ‘aspartame’, a sugar substitute, under the brand name ‘Sugar-Free’ in the year 1988.
Cadila had purportedly coined and embraced the trademark‘Sugar-Free’and was the principal client of the said trademark in India. Gujarat Co-operative received a stamp consisting of the words ‘Sugar-Free’ for their solidified pastry, indistinguishable with and misleadingly like the Cadila’s trademark.
The Gujarat Co-operative notwithstanding, as a matter of fact, were not offering their items under the name ‘Sugar-Free’, yet utilizing the same as an expressive modifier for their item. Cadila recorded a suit under the steady gaze of the educated Single Judge looking for a declaration of changeless injunction for controlling Gujarat Co-operative from utilizing as a part of any way, especially in connection with their items, the articulation ‘Sugar Free’, which Cadila asserted had obtained selectiveness as a trademark in connection with its different items.
The application for an injunction was expelled by the educated Single Judge, against which the present interest was recorded.It might be specified here that the litigant had a 74% offer in the sugar substitute market in India, plainly building up a prevalent premium.
The claim of eliteness depended upon the term ‘Sugar-Free’ being a coined word. The court decided that M/s Cadila Healthcare can’t be permitted to utilize the articulation since it was inalienable spellbinding in nature and has become a commonly utilized word in connection to nourishment and drinks. It likewise watched that “sugar-free” was not a coined word or an irregular combination of words.
Since it was a commonly utilized articulation in composed and additionally communicated in English, it could in this way not be hoarded for use by any exchange.
In perspective of the above supposition, the Court declined to concede an injunction on the utilization of the said check by Gujarat Co-operative as a piece of a sentence or appealing legend in order to portray the idea of their item.
They were that as it may, require diminishing the text dimension of the said term, which conspicuously stood greater than the trademark of the item.
Apply for TM Registration and discuss your brand strategy and understand importance of brand, logo and tagline with expert consultants at Tech Corp International Strategist India TCIS, India.
IF YOUR STRATEGY AND DOCUMENTATION ARE IN PLACE WE GET”YOUR” TRADEMARK REGISTERED IN TWO- THREE WEEKS
We at Tech Corp International Strategist India(TCIS) provide Trademark services:
TRADEMARK OFFICE ACTION RESPONSES
We at TCIS,India evaluate your office action after client discussion and understanding his business quotes and let you know if there is a fair chance to get your trademark application approved. If you decide to hire our trademark lawyers / trademark attorneys at TCIS to draft a response to the office action, cost effective flat rates are available.
As experienced trademark attorneys we at TCIS are well versed in responding to office action letters issued by trademark examining attorneys at the Indian Patent Office(IPO) and Indian Trademark Office.
Trademark Monitoring Services
We at TCIS,India also offers trademark monitoring services for OUR clients. This service is designed to protect the client’s trademark by periodically reviewing the records of the Indian Patent Office(IPO) and Indian Trademark Office, and additional sources, depending on the monitoring service requested, for applications to register, or use of, confusingly similar marks.
The firm offers a variety of services, including representation in cancellation and opposition proceedings at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
CALL NOW FOR YOUR FREE CONSULTATION WITH TRADEMARK ATTORNEY at 011 6654 4992 OR SEND AN EMAIL TO firstname.lastname@example.org
When you contact Trademark attorney at TCIS,India whether by phone or email, you can expect to receive prompt, professional, efficient and courteous service.
Clients of the firm enjoy the following:
Free initial trademark consultation with an experienced trademark attorney
Review of office actions by an experienced trademark attorney
Trademark attorney personal attention to their matters
Firm ideology of involvement that requires “going the extra mile”
Firm policy to return client phone calls and respond to emails immediately whenever practical
Cost-effective flat rates
OUR CLIENTS ARE LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE WORLD INDIA,UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, CHINA, DENMARK, ECUADOR, HONG KONG, MALAYSIA, SINGAPORE, INDIA, ITALY, INDONESIA, SOUTH AFRICA, SOUTH KOREA, SWEDEN, FRANCE, SWITZERLAND, U.A.E. , UK.
IF YOUR STRATEGY AND DOCUMENTATION ARE IN PLACE WE GET”YOUR” TRADEMARK REGISTERED IN TWO- THREE WEEKS
Co Author: Aarti Dhillon is a third-year law student pursuing BBA LLB (Hons.) with specialization in corporate laws from the College of Legal Studies, University of Petroleum and Energy studies. She is an enthusiastic individual with an emphasis on achieving astounding standards both personally and academically. She is an aspiring corporate law and patent law enthusiast who is captivated with exploring, learning and practicing technology, invention, business, and law simultaneously. In her opinion Law, business and technology have reliably been the thing that has intrigued her the most and how with genuine learning and practice with regards to the said three, one can organize the framework to oblige individuals’ individual needs. She plans to have an effective law career ahead and apply her aptitudes obtained from both her work and academic experience and further enable her to make a difference in people’s life.