Indian Patent Attorney, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STRATEGY, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), Patent Filing India, Patent Innovative Ideas, patent research service, PATENT STRATEGY

Inventorship and Ownership of Patents?

 

Who is the owner of the patent?

Inventorship and Ownership of a patent are separate and distinct issues. Disputes mainly arise over ownership of inventions between employees and employers.

Generally, the inventor owns a patent. However, the inventor and the owner of the patent may be different. This typically occurs when the inventor assigns the patent to an entity, such as a corporation or a university.

Complex and serious legal issues involving the ownership of a patent often arise when inventorship or the duty of an inventor to assign the patent is not clearly defined.

With patents, the concepts of inventorship and ownership, though related, are distinct:-

Inventorship is a legal concept that is based upon who meets the requirements to be an inventor.

The concept of Ownership relates to who actually owns the legal rights associated with the patent.

In the case of an Independent Inventor, the inventor and the owner of a patent are usually the same. In a University or a Corporate Setting, the inventor does not own the patent. Rather, the University or Corporation is the owner.

Patent applications filed in the United States must be filed in the name of the person who invented the invention.

The act of invention has two parts, “Conception” and “Reduction of Concept to practice.”

Conception is the formulation in the mind of the inventor of the complete means for solving a problem in such a way that a person skilled in the relevant art could practice the invention by following the inventor’s conception.

However, an invention is not complete following conception, It must further be reduced to practice. This can be accomplished in one of two ways.

 There may be an “actual” reduction to practice, which is when the invention is made and tested to determine that it works.

However, reduction to practice does not require the invention to be made. An invention can be “constructively” reduced to practice by filing a patent application claiming the invention.

For purposes of invention, a constructive reduction to practice is considered to be equivalent to an actual reduction to practice.

The inventor is the individual who has concept of the invention, provided of course that there has been a reduction to practice. An individual who reduces the invention to practice by following the conception of the inventor is not considered to be an inventor.

There may be only one inventor, which occurs when one person has conceived of the entire invention. Very commonly, however, invention is a collaborative process involving two or more people. When more than one person contributes to the conception of an invention, each is considered to be a joint inventor.

Joint inventors do not have to have physically worked together on the invention. There must have been some collaboration, however, and each of the inventors must have worked on the same subject matter and must make some contribution to the conception of the invention as it is claimed in the patent. All of the joint inventors do not have to be inventors of every claim.

Even if an individual contributes a conception to only one claim in a patent, that individual is still a joint inventor of the entire patent.

Each of the joint inventors are named on the cover page of a patent. The order of the names of the inventors has no legal significance.

The rights in the patent of one named inventor are the same as those of each of the other named inventors, irrespective of the order in which they are listed.

One final point concerning inventorship is that an individual who has not contributed to the conception of the invention is not an inventor, and is not permitted to be listed on the patent as an inventor.

Even if someone has contributed a large amount of money to permit the inventors to work, or if someone heads the research department in which the inventors work, that person is not an inventor.

Inclusion of such a person’s name as an inventor on a patent, with knowledge that the person does not qualify as an inventor, can result in invalidity of the patent. Therefore, that person’s name must not be listed as an inventor on the patent.

Absent any contrary agreement or duty to assign the patent, the named inventor is the owner of the patent.

As the owner of the patent, the inventor has the right to prevent others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing the patented invention.

If there are joint inventors, unless there is a contract, each of the inventors has an undivided interest in the entire invention as claimed in the patent.

Each of the joint inventors may practice the invention without consent of the other inventors and without any duty to pay the other inventors a portion of the profits from the exploitation of the patent. There is no fiduciary duty between the joint inventors.

Also, each joint inventor may license the patent without approval of the other inventors and without paying them a share of any royalties received from the licensee.

Because of this, in any situation involving more than one inventor, the inventors should agree by contract how the rights in the patent will be apportioned.

For example, the inventors may agree that all proceeds from licensing the invention will be split regardless of which inventor actually licenses the invention, or that each of the inventors will have separate exclusive rights to the patent in different geographical regions of the territory.

Often, inventors assign their inventions to their corporate or university employers. When this occurs, inventorship and ownership of the patent differs.

Here, the corporate or university assignee, and not the inventors themselves, owns the rights in the patent.

Unless there is an agreement requiring it, the assignee/owner does not have to make any payments to the assignor/inventor for exploiting the patent.

An obligation to assign a patent usually arises when there is a contract between the inventor and the assignee requiring an assignment, such as when a contractor is hired to solve a particular problem, or when certain employer/employee relationships exist.

Generally, an employee must assign an invention to an employer if the employee has a specific contractual obligation to assign or if the employee was hired to invent or is directed by the employer to solve a particular problem.

Although courts have divided on this issue, employees who have been hired to do research in general usually do not have to assign their inventions to their employers. Also, employees who have been hired for purposes other than to do research have no duty to assign their inventions to the employers.

Of course, parties may define their rights by contract. It is a good idea for companies and universities to have contracts in place with their researchers that require assignment of any invention discovered in the course of their employment.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STRATEGY, PATENT STRATEGY, patentability database, Startup Attorney India, Startup India Strategist, Startup Lawyer India, strategic business advice

BE AUTOMATIC MILLIONAIRE BY PROTECTING YOUR INNOVATION & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

WHO STOLE MY DREAM TO BECOME BILLIONAIRE?

MILLIONAIRE BY PROTECTING YOUR INNOVATION & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

WHAT YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN TAUGHT IN SCHOOL AND BUT WEREN’T 

WHAT is all boils down to is this:

IF YOUR PATENT STRATEGY & /or INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STRATEGY is not in place, YOU will FAIL in YOUR STARTUP Business

patent searching Expert on Internet patent coverage innovative

Get your Patent Searching Report by hiring strategic patent attorney and researching your technology in relation to the prior art in the same technology

WHEN to file Patent Applications Worldwide?

Patent Searching Strategy for Ideas and Inventions to be Patentable: Innovation at its BEST – GET the LEGAL Advantage

Innovation at its BEST:  Patent Search Services in India & Catering to Global Clients

Our expert team of patent attorneys & patent agents having a combined experience of more than 40 ++ years perform patent searching in many foreign patent databases which includes USPTO, EPO, JPO, SIPO, Canadian Patent Database, KIPO, Indian Patent Office, MYIPO and the like.  

The BEST Patent Strategy is to identify relevant patent classification IPC, USPC and CPC to find patent results.

The preferred innovation and cost effective patent research service is patent search worldwide (Worldwide Patentability Search) which includes the steps of performing patent searches based on inventor’s interview, invention keywords and key strings of the main crux points of the technology in different patent databases.

For example, WIPO patent database, Geneva can be a good start to perform the patent searches. Patent search by inventor name is useful when you know the scientists, researchers and inventors who are main technical experts in the technical industry.

USPTO Patent Searching Services

TCIS, India team of foreign trained patent attorneys & Intellectual Property Right (IPR) experts perform patent searching for Universities, Fortune 100 business entities,  Global business houses, inventors, entrepreneurs, researchers & foreign law firms. TCIS, India team of foreign trained patent attorneys also provide USPTO patent research services to US based inventors and US law firms.

Our patent enthusiasts, THINK GEEK team of patent engineers and patent experts understand YOUR patenting needs and provide customised tailor made patent search services to meet your business goal to secure Intellectual Property rights in local and International markets. Our highly skilled team of experienced patent analysts who are trained by USPTO patent attorneys search patent documents and non-patent literature.

PATENT TUTORIALS: Basics of PATENTS: Types of Patents, Patent Searches &Patent Application 

Invention and Patent services Reviews by Inventors & Business Startups

Over the years of our patent practice our Genius IP clients and customers to whom we have provided patent services have reviewed our patent services. Our think GEEK team of patent enthusiasts, patent attorneys, patent lawyers and patent agents follow the best patent research practices for determining patentability of inventions. If you looking for best invention and patent services and customised solutions you have come to the right place.

Schedule a legal patent consultation with our patent expert today to meet your patenting goals for your invention. Have the legal advantage of registering your patent in India. Our patent agents and Indian patent lawyers provide patent registration services in India before Indian Patent Office.

Get the broadest set of patent claims granted by the Indian patent office during patent examination stage. Have an idea and don’t know whether to file a provisional patent for your innovative idea?

We are here to be part of the exciting journey of patenting your invention.

TCIS, India assist brilliant entrepreneurs across the globe for example some inventors were based in Santa Cruz, CA. We believe that our patent team are thorough professionals. We have assisted in filing provisional patent ideas for mobile/cloud application sector. WE are known to provide sterling work projects to our GENIUS minds. We are a rare combination of technically sound patent attorney who understood mobile/cloud patenting based inventions. Turnaround time is provided to the client after review of the invention disclosure form. 

Our Clients are impressed with our strategic business advice and we are preferred competent consultants in Intellectual Property due diligence for IP position of potential partners & competitors. Our patent research report which we executed proved helpful for  go/no go decision for the patent licensing partnership. 

Patent reviews which we will like to share with our viewers:

DO YOU want to obtain patents for your innovation Idea technology Review the present positive law rules for obtaining patents.png