Patent Information Professional Certification
Business Administration, Business Models, Business Networking, Business Owner, Business Plans, Business Relationships, Business Strategy, Business-To-Business, IPR Companies, Digital Agencies, Ecommer, divisional patent, Indian Patent Attorney, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), Patent Filing India, patent filling steps, Patent in technology, patent infringement, Patent Innovative Ideas, patent lawyer, PATENT STRATEGY, patent validity, patentability database, strategic business advice, tech corp legal, Uncategorized

International Patent Research Workshop for Intrigued Genius Minds

International Patent Research Workshop for Intrigued Genius Minds

Take your intelligence to next level. Welcome to the world of understanding innovations happening in cutting edge technologies across the globe. Learn more about current technology trends that will shape up economic disruptions across the globe. Learn more about innovations happening in the field of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Computing, understand use of chatbots, virtual agents, virtual assistants, wearables – augmented and virtual reality, IoT, Blockchain and other state of the art technology.

Albert Einstein, Thomas Alva Edison and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart all were genius people in their lifetime.

2

Now what set these people apart from the rest and made them achieve what they did?

It’s pretty simple really: they all simplified the existence of existing laws and the way of seeing life in different way.

 

Every human is eligible to attain that height of being genius. CHOICE is YOUR whether to BELIEVE in YOUR IDEAS and #makeithappen

Imperfection is beauty, madness is genius and it’s better to be absolutely ridiculous than absolutely boring. – Marilyn Monroe

5

 

 

International Patent Research Workshop 

Venue: Aerocity, New Delhi

 

 

Demystifying Patent Research Basics

The patent research workshop will cover holistic view of the legal viewpoint

As to how to perform patentability search?

How to perform state of the art searches?

How to perform validity patent searches?

How to perform Infringement searches and freedom to operate searches?

2

As a company it is important to understand the type of research which needs to be performed to identify the OPPORTUNITIES to create your own niche in the competitive market. For example, patentability search can be performed if any person or any innovator of a company has an idea or is doing a research.

WHEN to perform patentability search before filing a patent or after filing provisional patent application?

The company would like to know What is the SWOT analysis or in simple terms, identifying what are the different innovations or research which has already happened across the globe.

As a business owner knowing what happens in 2-3 years from now is a strategic move

When to protect intellectual property?

It’s very tough question to answer and it is not very easy to protect every creation of mind. Yes, there are some ways in which you can actually add some pointers and then file a patent application. Ideas are creation of mind and it might happen at one point of time the same idea is bouncing in multiple minds at neutron level across the globe.

3.png

First very important factor for an innovation to be PATENT WORTHY is that an idea should be new. New means that idea should be new concept all over the world not only in India. So the idea actually qualify for even being patent worthy is performing patentability research. Many patent databases are very helpful to perform the patentability. One example is WIPO which stands for world intellectual property organisation.

The WIPO database is worldwide patent database. Other important databases are espacenet, and USPTO.

Many times we get patent queries regarding what kind of patent databases are you using for performing your any kind of patentability or any kind of patent research?

4

Our BELIEVE is SIMPLE we use our intellect and use non paid patent tools.

Obviously, when you are using a paid database it is expensive. However, you are not using your intellect as a patent attorney or as a patent researcher to come up with ways and means to do your research in a manner which suffice the purpose of that particular invention or idea so that is very very important.

Over the years we have been able to find out better results by defining the kind of scope of work which we plan when we get a patent research query.

There is no STEP WISE MANTRA that would be applicable in all the patent searches. What is important is to analyse CRUX of the invention or the innovative features of the invention use your intellect as a patent researcher, and make the key strings.

What kind of strings will work better and if you have less time how to go about doing state of the art searches?

State of art search is basically talks about what kind of innovation already has happened in a particular sector. For example it can be a solar sector where by solar energy is being used to light up the lamp or it can be a LED sector where the technology relates to packaging of the LED to reduce the heat sink capacity.

However, what is important to understand what kind of approach or parameters are you going to take into considerations as a patent researcher.

KEY LEARNINGS FROM THE WORKSHOP

We will be discussing a lot on different kind of technologies. It is exciting to know that YOU don’t have to be an expert in a particular technology to do a patent research. Obviously, if you are a scientist or Phd in particular area it will take less time to understand the technology but at the same time as a patent researcher or as a patent attorney one should understand your job is to identify the innovative features.

Imbibing the acumen of a researcher and techno legal domain will is helpful when you are responding to office section response. The office action response is issued by the patent examiner and the patent examiner performs the search on a particular invention and will come up with objections so as a patent expert or patent attorney you need to respond to those objections. How to respond to office action response will be part of different workshop which we would be doing in the coming months.

How different kind of strategies can be applied as there is no one strategy which will be applicable to all patent searches but of course that key take away from the workshop would be that you would be able to understand what are the parameters you should actually look when you are doing the research.

Multinationals are coming in India so there is lot of job opportunities which are going to be there in near future and if you are already in the league of understanding how to perform patent research and can STRATEGISE a BUSINESS PLAN for the startup you get yourself a high package job.

You will be in a position to help the companies with their day to day activities whereby a lot of research is being performed by the scientists and many a times they have no clue whatsoever.

What kind of research is of prime importance?

What kind of research should be finished first?

What kind of research is being done by competitors?

For any questions we are reachable at legal@lawtcis.com or fill in the form https://goo.gl/forms/O9nHbSGDQo8P85WZ2

Replying to office actions is like writing on stone. Statements once made can't be retracted. A short sighted response aiming merely to overcome the objection
Indian Patent Attorney, International Patent Treaty, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), Patent Filing India, Patent Innovative Ideas, patent research service, PATENT STRATEGY, patent validity

Filing Response to Office Action for a Patent Application

 

Processing of a patent application is a multi-step process. After the patent application has been documented and filed, the Patent examiners examine the Patent application. For this, a request for examination must be recorded in the prescribed manner with the Indian patent office.

A request for examination of Patent application is filed within six months from the date of publication of Patent application.

(For fees related to request of examination of application of patent refer- http://www.ipindia.nic.in/writereaddata/Portal/IPOFormUpload/1_11_1/Fees.pdf)

No application for a patent shall be examined unless the applicant or a patent attorney makes a request in the prescribed manner for such examination within the prescribed period.

When a request for examination of a patent application has been made by an applicant or a patent attorney, the application and specification and other documents related thereto shall be referred at the earliest by the Controller to an examiner for making a report.

The Examiner at the patent office checks for its qualification and formal clothing according to the law of every locale. After which a preparatory judgment is passed which is called “FER or First Examination Report” which might be looking for any sort of correction or alteration, or specifically giving out dismissals if the application esteems to be not fit and qualified.

An examination report is issued by the Indian patent office. The examination report is likewise called as first examination report (FER). The examination report contains a rundown of complaints raised by an inspector of the Indian patent office. The complaints are both specialized and formal.

The candidate needs to record a response to the examination report within a year of issuance of the principal examination report.

An application for a patent shall be deemed to have been abandoned, if the applicant is unable to compile with all the requirements imposed on him by the patent examiner.

After which the patent lawyer or operators might set up a response containing contentions, clarifications that might be opposite or obliging the analyst’s needs according to the cases required which is additionally called “Office Action Response”.

If necessary, the inspector of the Indian Patent office frequently calls a candidate or his approved operator for hearing of the case. Once the inspector is happy with the response documented and the sum total of what conventions have been agreed by a candidate, the application is placed arranged by giving. In the event that the inspector is not happy with the response documented and need to meet a candidate or his approved specialist (if an operator is named) to clear up specific issues, he may call a candidate/operator for a hearing.

At long last, after various office actions and replies, the analyst will go to a judgment over the patent application. Same occasions occur amid pre and post allow restriction of a patent yet the office actions are directed by 3 substances, the candidate, the inspector and the resistance filing party.

RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION IN RESPECT OF INDIAN PATENT OFFICE

As per “The Patent Rules, 2003 as amended by Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2016” and opportunity to put the application altogether for allowing under “Section 21” has been lessened from a year to a half year.

The ideal opportunity for putting an application all together to allow under Section 21 of Patents Act, 1970 in situations where the principal proclamation of protests has been issued by the Office on or after 16 May 2016, might be a half year (six months) from the date on which the said first explanation of complaints is issued to the candidate to follow every one of the necessities forced under the Act and Rules made there under as per Rule 24B (5) of the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2016.

The ideal opportunity for putting an application all together for allow under section 21 as recommended under sub-rule (5) might be additionally stretched out for a time of three months on a demand in Form-4 for expansion of time alongside endorsed charge, made to the Controller before the expiry of the period determined under sub-rule (5).

Response to the objections: General Principles The response to the examination report must be complete. The response must demonstrate that the objections raised by the analyst are not legitimate. Besides, the response must contain sufficient and successful contentions with regards to the patentability of the invention

FILING RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION WITH RESPECT TO USPTO

In the United States, an Office action is a report composed by an analyst in a patent examination system and sent to the patent applicant. The expression is used in numerous jurisdictions. As a rule, the candidate must respond to an Office action within 6 months from the date the Office action is issued or the USPTO will desert the application, the application charge won’t be discounted, and stamp won’t register.

Types of office action:

·NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION: Non-Final Office Actions are always the first office actions issued for a patent application. In non-final office actions, the patent examiner states his conclusion on the patentability of the claims. After a survey of the non-final office action, the application has the choice of no less than one of the accompanying.       

Contending the examiner is mistaken, and

Revising the claims to beat the inspector’s rejections. While responding to the Non-Final Office Action, the patent attorney should state in the response that the response to the office is “An Amendment/Reply to an Office Action under 37 CFR 1.111.

FINAL OFFICE ACTION: Final Office actions are commonly second office actions that are sent by the examiner in the wake of checking on the candidate’s response to the first non-final office action. The Final Office Action may incorporate:

 The same rejections as the first non-final office action or

New rejections- When responding to final office actions, the candidate has managed the same opportunities as responding to a non-final office action, with the exception of government fees must be paid if the candidate is revising the claims. On the off chance that the candidate is not revising the claims, the patent attorney should state in the response to the Final Office Action that the response to the office action is “A Reply to an Office Action under 37 CFR 1.116.”

Further

 When a final office action is issued a survey of the claims on the merits of the claims is “closed.” Therefore, to correct the claims after a non-final office action a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) is required.

Essentially, a Request for Continued Examination reopens prosecution, enabling the patent attorney to change the claims. On the off chance that the patent attorney’s amendments and arguments defeat the present rejections when filing an amendment with an RCE (amendment under 37 CFR 1.114) the following office action issued will be a non-final office action or a notice of recompense.

Be that as it may, if the amendments and arguments are not persuasive, the following office action issued will be a final office action. Because of the extra fees to alter the claims, when filing an amendment under 37 CFR 1.114 it is urgent to have a meeting with the examiner to discuss the merits of amendments.

Inventors and start-ups should understand that an average patent prosecution process includes no less than 1-2 Requests for Continued Examinations are required.

There are fees associated with filing data disclosure statements. Data disclosure statements are letters from the candidate to the patent office stating that the candidate has discovered new references that may influence the patentability of their development.

Applicants can bid an Examiner’s decision if the claims have been dismissed twice. Accordingly, if the claims were not corrected inside a response to a non-final office action, the claims are opportune to be bid. In spite of the fact that I don’t suggest filing an interest after a first final office action has been issued for start-ups, for real corporations this a strategy that they can take. Amid bid (takes 2-3 years) or Pre-Appeal Conference Request (6 months – 1 year), a board will audit the claims, referred to craftsmanship, and analyst’s rejections to decide whether the inspector’s rejections have justified.

how to patent a business idea in india how to legally protect a business idea